Create AI-powered tutorials effortlessly: Learn, teach, and share knowledge with our intuitive platform. (Get started for free)
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Structure vs Freedom The Coursera Timeline Compared to Independent Study Pace
When considering the Deep Learning Specialization, the structured timeline of Coursera versus the freedom of independent study becomes a key factor. Coursera's courses follow a defined path, featuring deadlines and assessments. This structured approach can be beneficial for learners who prefer a clear roadmap, keeping them engaged and on track. The structure can also foster a sense of accountability and propel progress, making it a viable option for those who find external guidance helpful.
On the other hand, independent study offers complete flexibility in pacing and planning. Learners can pick their own journey through the material, adjusting the timeline to suit their needs and interests. This freedom is appealing, especially for individuals who thrive in a self-directed environment. However, the lack of a pre-set structure can be challenging for some. The absence of external deadlines and guidance might require a strong level of self-motivation and effective resource management.
In essence, the decision boils down to individual learning preferences and priorities. Coursera's approach suits individuals who flourish within a structured environment, while self-directed learning might be better for those who value the freedom to explore at their own rhythm. The ideal path varies depending on the learner and their specific learning objectives.
When exploring the landscape of deep learning, the choice between Coursera's structured approach and independent study boils down to a fundamental trade-off: structure versus freedom. Coursera, with its predefined timelines, sets specific deadlines for assignments and assessments, essentially creating a sense of urgency and a clear pathway through the material. This can be beneficial for individuals who thrive in organized environments and benefit from external pressure. In contrast, independent study allows for complete flexibility. Learners can set their own pace, revisiting topics as needed. While this can lead to a more nuanced understanding of some subjects, it might also extend the overall timeframe for completing the material, potentially leading to a slower rate of progress.
Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization, for instance, breaks down the learning journey into weekly modules, ensuring a consistent engagement with the material. This regularity aids in maintaining momentum. On the other hand, those who learn independently may experience a more sporadic learning experience, potentially hampering long-term retention.
The structured nature of online courses often provides a sense of community through forums and peer feedback mechanisms. This fosters a collaborative learning environment. The independent learner, conversely, can feel a sense of isolation, which could impact overall motivation. Coursera courses leverage expert-vetted resources, making the process of finding quality information more efficient. Self-directed learners, in contrast, have the responsibility of sourcing their own materials, and this can potentially lead to relying on unreliable sources or gaps in their knowledge if not careful.
Instructor feedback, another key benefit of the Coursera model, facilitates clarification of any doubts that may arise. Self-learners, however, lack this immediate feedback, potentially making it more challenging to gauge one's level of understanding. Furthermore, the structured nature of Coursera aids in tracking progress and seeing tangible achievements. Without this framework, independent learners have to develop their own metrics, which could impact their ability to stay on track.
Research also indicates that the structured nature of online courses like those found on Coursera often contribute to higher completion rates than self-directed study. This implies that external pressure and motivation play a significant role in maintaining consistency in learning. The inclusion of project-based assessments within Coursera's structure helps strengthen practical skills. Self-directed study might neglect this practical application, potentially hindering the transition from theoretical concepts to real-world problem-solving.
Though self-study offers the most freedom in choosing learning paths, this flexibility can also be a hurdle. It requires careful prioritization of topics to avoid gaps in foundational knowledge that may impede future learning. Unlike Coursera, self-study does not offer formal recognition in the form of a certificate, which can impact marketability, particularly in fields that require certification. Ultimately, the choice between the two often boils down to individual preferences and learning styles. Coursera might be best for those who thrive in structured environments, while independent learning might suit those who prefer self-driven exploration and can motivate themselves.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Guided Projects in Coursera vs Finding Your Own Deep Learning Practice Tasks
When choosing between Coursera's Guided Projects and crafting your own deep learning practice, you're essentially deciding between a structured learning path and complete autonomy. Coursera's approach delivers guided projects with expert instruction, emphasizing practical skills crucial for deep learning roles. The structured format, with clear goals and project outlines, can make acquiring specific skills easier. However, self-chosen tasks offer a wider scope of exploration, allowing learners to pursue their own interests and delve deeper into niche areas. This freedom comes with a caveat, though. Without the structure and feedback loops often present in guided projects, it can be challenging to maintain focus and ensure that your learning remains well-rounded and relevant. Your choice will influence not only how deeply you understand the concepts but also your ability to translate those concepts into real-world deep learning applications. While self-directed practice might lead to a more nuanced understanding of particular areas, it might also cause knowledge gaps if not balanced with broader foundational understanding and validation through formal methods or assessments.
When comparing the guided projects within Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization to finding your own practice tasks for deep learning, a few key distinctions emerge. Coursera's approach offers immediate feedback loops through built-in assessment tools, allowing learners to pinpoint areas needing improvement promptly. Independent study often involves a delayed, self-driven evaluation, which might miss crucial learning moments.
Each guided project on Coursera has a clear purpose, focusing on specific deep learning skills. This targeted approach helps learners develop a well-rounded skillset. Conversely, independent learners may find their practice less structured, resulting in uneven knowledge across the field.
The curated resources and datasets available in Coursera's projects save time and ensure learners are working with relevant materials. Self-learners, in contrast, face the challenge of sifting through vast information, risking exposure to outdated or unreliable sources.
Furthermore, the platform often fosters a sense of community through discussion forums and potential group projects. Independent study can feel more isolated, potentially hindering the development of collaborative problem-solving abilities that can be helpful in real-world scenarios.
Research suggests that structured environments like Coursera's tend to lead to more efficient task completion. The absence of deadlines in self-study can lead to procrastination and distractions. Furthermore, Coursera's projects culminate in tangible outputs, such as graded assignments or even portfolio-worthy examples. These outputs bolster a learner's resume and showcase their skills in a practical manner. Independent projects, while valuable, often lack this formal output.
Coursera's project structure helps to manage cognitive load by breaking down complex information into smaller, understandable chunks with clear goals. Independent learners, without this built-in support, may struggle to organize their study material, potentially leading to a feeling of being overwhelmed.
Guided projects usually incorporate a mix of assessments, including quizzes and peer evaluations, encouraging engagement and knowledge retention. Independent learners are left to rely on self-assessment, which may not be as accurate in identifying areas for improvement.
Completing a Coursera project often earns learners a certificate or badge, which can enhance their professional profiles. Self-study projects, while impressive, lack this formal validation, potentially making it harder to communicate expertise and commitment to potential employers.
Finally, the guided projects on Coursera are interconnected, forming a logical progression in learning with clearly defined goals and skills to acquire. In contrast, developing a coherent study path for deep learning through independent study can be difficult and may lead to gaps in essential foundational knowledge.
Ultimately, understanding the difference between these two approaches is crucial in deciding how to acquire deep learning skills. Whether the structure of guided projects or the freedom of independent study is preferable is a personal decision based on learning preferences and individual goals.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Peer Review Benefits in Coursera Missing from Solo Learning Methods
When learning deep learning independently, you miss out on a crucial element found in platforms like Coursera: peer review. Coursera integrates peer-reviewed assessments in a significant portion of its active courses, around 30% in recent estimates. This means students evaluate each other's work, offering and receiving feedback. This collaborative aspect goes beyond simply learning from course materials. It fosters a sense of community and encourages a deeper understanding of the topics as you analyze and critique the work of others. This dynamic exchange isn't present in solitary learning, where understanding often relies solely on self-evaluation.
The absence of this dynamic in self-study can lead to uncertainty. You might be unsure if your grasp of a concept is truly correct, or if you're missing a key point. Peer review in Coursera creates a sense of shared responsibility that can improve comprehension and solidify learning. It also encourages active engagement, which may not be as easily attained when learning solely by yourself. Thus, Coursera's peer review process offers a learning depth and breadth that might be absent in self-directed study, impacting the overall effectiveness of your educational journey. While self-study can certainly provide a valuable learning experience, the benefits of structured peer feedback in online courses like Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization are difficult to replicate.
While Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization offers a structured path, a significant advantage it possesses over solo learning methods is the integration of peer review within its assessment framework. Around 30% of Coursera's active courses currently incorporate peer-reviewed assignments, where learners evaluate each other's work. Although the proportion of courses with this feature has shown some fluctuation, it remains a notable element of the platform's design. Notably, research from 2023 suggested that some Coursera learners experienced challenges like inadequate plagiarism checks and delayed support. Nonetheless, the presence of peer assessment brings distinct advantages that self-study often lacks.
Firstly, the dynamic of peer review facilitates prompt feedback and a continuous learning loop. It allows learners to quickly identify and correct misunderstandings before they become entrenched. Without this ongoing feedback cycle, independent learners may struggle to determine whether they genuinely grasped the content. This can be particularly crucial when exploring complex topics like deep learning.
Secondly, peer review introduces a diversity of viewpoints and problem-solving approaches. It encourages learners to consider alternative perspectives, potentially challenging their initial assumptions and fostering more critical thinking. This breadth of perspective can lead to more robust and flexible solutions compared to the possibly limited perspective developed in a solitary study environment.
Furthermore, the act of contributing feedback to others can also serve as a powerful learning tool. Reviewing the work of peers forces a learner to delve deeper into the subject matter, often revealing gaps in their own understanding. This sort of insight is not inherently part of a self-study setup.
The collective aspect of peer review fosters a sense of responsibility and shared learning. Learners become more accountable for their own learning and progress when aware that their work will be evaluated by their peers. This can be an important motivator, especially for those who find it challenging to maintain focus and momentum while studying independently.
The collaborative nature of Coursera’s peer-review approach also facilitates the development of crucial interpersonal skills, such as providing constructive criticism and collaborating with others. These "soft skills" are vital in a range of professional contexts but are less likely to be developed through self-directed learning alone. The social aspect of peer review also generates a sense of community, which can contribute to increased motivation and engagement, aspects often lacking in self-study.
Another key benefit of peer review is the chance to receive a wider range of feedback than would typically be available in self-study. This multitude of feedback can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of a subject, helping to identify blind spots and refine expertise more thoroughly. Peer review also provides opportunities to articulate and defend one's understanding, building confidence in articulating ideas which is valuable when applying learned concepts to real-world scenarios.
While not without potential issues, such as occasionally encountering inappropriate assessments, peer review appears to offer significant benefits not present in traditional independent learning. Research consistently suggests that peer learning, especially within a structured online environment, yields positive results, although many student experiences with these features are often overlooked in the broader assessment of these systems. The importance of incorporating student feedback for continuous course improvement has been highlighted by many studies, further underscoring the value of systems like peer review. The benefits of these features and the impact of course structure on retention and learner success seem to suggest that while self-study offers a great deal of freedom, the structured and social elements that some platforms bring can improve the learning experience. The ultimate decision of whether these benefits outweigh the trade-offs of a more rigid learning environment will, however, always depend on individual learning preferences and goals.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Cost Analysis Between Platform Subscription and Free Online Resources
When considering the financial aspect of online learning, a significant difference arises between paid platforms and freely available resources. Platforms often utilize a subscription model, which entails a set monthly or yearly fee. This model, while potentially requiring a larger initial investment, often delivers structured learning paths, certificates that can boost one's professional standing, and various engagement tools. Many free resources are readily available online, though they might lack the in-depth support and mechanisms for accountability seen in paid options, which can lead to incomplete knowledge and diminished motivation for learners. This difference can pose a challenge to platform developers, who grapple with successfully converting free users into paid subscribers. If not managed carefully, this can lead to the content being viewed as less valuable. In the end, the choice rests on whether the learner values a structured, formally recognized education over the flexibility and financial appeal of free resources.
When weighing the costs of learning, the decision between platform subscriptions and free online resources presents a nuanced landscape. While free resources might initially seem appealing, they often come with hidden costs and variable quality. Research suggests that a large portion of free online courses lack the structured curricula found in dedicated subscription platforms. This can lead to gaps in understanding, hindering a learner's progress.
Beyond the immediate cost of a subscription, free resources can lead to wasted time filtering through poor-quality content. Sometimes you find yourself having to invest in additional materials to fill in the knowledge gaps left by incomplete or poorly designed free courses. This can quickly offset any initial cost savings.
Further complicating the cost-benefit analysis is the value of formal recognition. Many subscription platforms, like Coursera, provide certificates upon course completion. These certificates can bolster a learner's marketability, particularly in fields that demand formal qualifications. Free resources, however, typically lack this crucial element, potentially limiting career opportunities.
Subscription-based platforms tend to have more rigorous content review processes. Expert curators often evaluate materials, ensuring quality and consistency. In contrast, the lack of oversight in free online resources can result in an uneven educational experience. The information can be unreliable, outdated, or simply not well-organized, leading to confusion and frustration.
Furthermore, subscription services often provide ongoing access to updated content and learner support. Free resources, on the other hand, might become obsolete quickly, leaving learners with outdated information. This raises questions about the long-term value of free resources.
Research indicates that learners in structured online environments exhibit higher engagement levels. The presence of assessment checkpoints and defined timelines helps motivate learners and maintain momentum. These elements are often missing from free resources, potentially leading to a lower level of commitment and completion.
Similarly, subscription services frequently offer community forums and peer interaction, enriching the learning process. The social interaction and collaborative aspects can help overcome the feeling of isolation that can accompany independent study. Free resources typically lack such features, potentially reducing learning motivation and collaboration.
Cost analyses suggest that subscription services can offer scalable learning paths. They often provide a structured progression from basic concepts to more advanced topics. Free resources, however, can lack this coherent structure, leading to confusion and a potentially incomplete understanding.
Studies have revealed that learners in structured subscription programs have significantly higher course completion rates than those using only free resources. This suggests that having a defined learning path contributes to greater achievement of educational goals.
Finally, subscription services often allow learners to tailor their education to specific career goals. They can choose courses or specializations that directly relate to their desired job market. Free resources, with their broader scope, might not always cover the specific niche areas required for specialized job roles.
In conclusion, while free resources might seem like a financially attractive option, the overall cost of utilizing them can be unexpectedly high. The combination of potential knowledge gaps, wasted time, lack of formal recognition, and limited long-term support can outweigh any perceived savings. The cost-effectiveness of subscription-based platforms ultimately depends on individual learning preferences and career goals. It's a complex equation involving many variables beyond just the immediate price tag.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Professional Certification Value vs Self Documented Learning Progress
When deciding how to learn and demonstrate your knowledge, especially in fields like deep learning, the difference between earning a professional certification and simply tracking your own learning progress becomes important. A certification acts as a verified stamp of approval for your skills and expertise, boosting your credibility with potential employers. It's a more concrete way to show you've mastered a particular skill set and often opens doors to better job opportunities.
On the flip side, keeping your own records of what you've learned through self-study is valuable for personal development and understanding. It shows initiative and a desire to expand your knowledge base. However, this independent approach, while helpful, lacks the formal recognition that a certification provides. In the professional world, where credentials often matter, this can be a disadvantage. While self-taught individuals can develop a deep understanding through dedicated effort, employers may place more emphasis on officially recognized certifications.
Essentially, the choice depends on your personal goals and the specific needs of your field. If you need something to bolster your resume or prove your expertise to prospective employers, then a certification might be preferred. But, if the focus is on personal growth and learning for its own sake, then meticulously documenting your independent study could be perfectly appropriate.
Formal certifications, often awarded by professional organizations after rigorous evaluation, serve as a visible marker of acquired knowledge and skills within a specific field. These certifications can be a significant boost for career advancement and overall job performance, acting as a quantifiable measure of professional development. Platforms like Coursera offer a range of professional certificates across many areas, providing a path to bolster one's credentials in technology, project management, and other fields.
Their structure involves a series of courses aimed at building a comprehensive understanding of a domain, and specializations that delve even deeper into a specific area. The key here is that these credentials validate competency and help build credibility within the field. This credibility can make a big difference when competing for jobs or seeking promotions because they serve as a common language employers use to assess prospective employees.
On the other hand, self-study is a more informal and personal approach to learning. It's a journey driven by one's own curiosity and goals, without the formal structure of a certification program. While lifelong learning is essential for staying competitive in today's market, and requires traits like adaptability and a curious mind to keep pace with industry trends, the challenge with self-study is proving that learning has actually occurred.
There's a clear distinction in how valuable employers might perceive the results of a self-study path compared to a formally recognized certification. Simply documenting one's learning may not carry the same weight as a certification. That's because these credentials are more broadly recognized and accepted as a reliable indicator of competency. In a job market that's becoming increasingly competitive, having a readily verifiable credential, like a certificate, can give individuals a significant advantage in standing out from others who may have similar skills but lack the formal recognition. This gap in perceived value could lead to self-learners having a harder time proving their skill level and achieving their career goals, at least in some domains. The choice between self-study and pursuing formal certification can depend on individual goals and learning styles. Choosing one over the other reflects the trade-off between personal autonomy and the need for widely recognized credentials in many fields.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Direct Access to Teaching Assistants vs Online Community Support
When comparing Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization to self-study, the distinction between direct access to teaching assistants and relying on an online community for support becomes clear. Coursera's model offers the advantage of personalized support from teaching assistants, allowing learners to get immediate feedback and assistance whenever needed. This personalized approach can significantly accelerate learning and improve outcomes, particularly when tackling complex concepts.
On the other hand, self-study primarily relies on online communities where learners interact with peers. This fosters a collaborative learning environment where individuals can share knowledge and learn from each other's experiences. While valuable, community-based support can lack the immediate and specialized help that a dedicated teaching assistant provides.
Ultimately, the decision boils down to individual learning styles and preferences. Those who thrive in a structured environment with expert guidance might find Coursera's approach more beneficial. However, learners who prefer a more collaborative and self-directed approach may find community support sufficient for their needs. The choice, therefore, depends on how much a learner values individualized support compared to the benefits of a shared learning environment.
When considering the learning experience offered by platforms like Coursera, a crucial aspect to consider is the support system in place. While Coursera typically offers access to an online community, it's worth comparing this with the potential of having direct access to teaching assistants (TAs). This difference can have a significant impact on both the learning process and its overall effectiveness.
Direct access to TAs provides immediate and personalized support, allowing learners to get help in real-time during challenging parts of the curriculum. This is especially valuable in a complex field like deep learning, where concepts can be intricate and require tailored explanations. TAs can offer clarity and guidance when encountering roadblocks, potentially streamlining the learning process and improving overall comprehension. Furthermore, the immediate feedback provided by a TA can significantly enhance the efficiency of problem-solving.
However, relying solely on an online community, while having benefits such as collaboration and a larger group to get advice from, may come with challenges. The feedback received through community discussions can vary widely in quality and specificity, since the participants may have different levels of expertise and different perspectives on the content. Additionally, obtaining feedback through a community may take longer, potentially impacting the learner's motivation if answers are delayed or unhelpful. While these forums do allow learners to connect with a wider range of people and share diverse ideas, there's no guarantee that the advice they receive will be consistently high-quality or properly tailored to their unique learning style.
The presence of trained TAs can help ensure a more structured and consistent learning experience. They are often better equipped to steer learners back on track if they deviate from the intended learning pathway. Online communities, however, can encourage divergence from the core curriculum. Learners might stumble upon new and interesting topics in their discussions, but this can also lead them off track and potentially impact their progress toward mastering the foundational material. This issue could affect consistency and potentially lead to uneven knowledge gaps.
A key difference lies in the quality and validation of resources. TAs are generally trained in a specific field, allowing them to suggest and verify the accuracy of shared materials. In comparison, the quality of resources available through community forums is a bit less certain, as they rely on peer-sharing. Consequently, a learner might find themselves exploring unverified or potentially outdated information within the community, which could potentially undermine the learning process. It's also worth noting that learners with access to TAs generally report higher motivation, likely due to the inherent accountability that personalized attention provides. The online community, though fostering collaboration, can sometimes lead to a sense of isolation, which can impact engagement levels and completion rates.
The speed at which responses are received can also vary. TAs typically maintain regular office hours or specific time slots, creating a predictable pattern for students seeking assistance. Community support, however, lacks that consistency. The responsiveness of other learners within the community fluctuates, impacting feedback loops. This variation can affect the pacing and overall experience of the learners in a less predictable way.
Ultimately, the decision of whether a structured TA support system or an online community approach is more effective hinges on personal preferences and learning styles. Both systems have pros and cons. While TAs can offer a highly structured and personalized learning journey, online communities offer a broader platform for social learning and collaboration. Understanding these nuances is critical for maximizing one's learning potential.
7 Key Differences Between Self-Study and Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization in 2024 - Weekly Assignment Deadlines vs Personal Study Schedule Management
One of the starkest contrasts between self-directed deep learning study and Coursera's structured approach is how you manage your learning time. Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization, for example, enforces a weekly schedule with deadlines for assignments and assessments. This structure provides a push towards timely completion, promotes a sense of responsibility, and offers a built-in framework for community interaction and feedback. On the other hand, independent learners have the freedom to build their own study plan. While this allows for a customized pace and the ability to focus on areas of interest, it also means there's no external pressure to stay on track. It can be a challenge to stay motivated and avoid falling behind without the accountability of deadlines and regular interactions. Effective time management and self-discipline become crucial for those who learn independently to prevent procrastination and ensure consistent progress. The decision ultimately reflects a preference for the inherent structure and support of a course vs. the autonomy of self-paced study. It's a critical consideration in how learners organize and manage their deep learning journey.
When comparing the learning experience offered by platforms like Coursera to self-directed study, the presence of weekly assignment deadlines presents a fascinating contrast to the freedom of managing your own study schedule.
The structured nature of Coursera's Deep Learning Specialization, with its inherent deadlines, can influence how efficiently learners process and retain information. Cognitive load theory suggests that breaking down complex tasks into manageable units, as deadlines often do, can ease the burden on the learner's mental resources, leading to a potentially more productive learning experience. In contrast, self-study can sometimes lead to an overwhelming cognitive load, especially without clear milestones or benchmarks.
Furthermore, the implications of procrastination are often pronounced in self-study environments. Research suggests a significant portion of learners in self-study scenarios engage in avoidance behaviors, delaying learning, and ultimately affecting their mastery of the subject. This contrasts with Coursera's structured environment, where deadlines introduce a sense of urgency, bolstering motivation for some learners who might otherwise struggle with staying on track.
Temporal motivation theory offers a possible explanation for this phenomenon. The inherent pressure of deadlines can act as a psychological catalyst, increasing productivity, especially for those who tend to struggle with intrinsic motivation. This structured approach facilitates regular feedback loops, helping learners identify and correct misunderstandings swiftly. Without these scheduled check-ins, learners may not realize gaps in their comprehension until much later, potentially leading to a longer path towards mastery.
The presence of others in a structured learning environment also brings social dynamics into play. The concept of social accountability suggests that the mere awareness of a group or cohort expecting completion can influence individual effort. This inherent accountability is typically absent in self-study situations, highlighting a potential disadvantage of independent learning. Interestingly, the act of regularly submitting assignments seems to contribute to better long-term retention. Studies have shown that learners who participate in timely submissions tend to exhibit greater recall of course material, emphasizing the importance of consistent engagement fostered by deadlines.
While structured learning with deadlines can improve focus, excessive pressure can lead to burnout. There's a delicate balance to strike. While Coursera's approach promotes consistent engagement, it can also lead to heightened stress levels, especially when the pace is too fast. Self-study, with its inherent flexibility, can be a better option for those prone to burnout. Furthermore, it's notable that employers tend to value the skills associated with managing deadlines and multiple tasks, often viewing candidates who have successfully completed structured programs with deadlines as more capable of adapting to professional environments that demand prompt action. This translates into real-world implications: individuals who demonstrate the ability to manage time and produce work under a structured timeline may have a competitive advantage in the job market.
While self-study undoubtedly provides significant freedom and a deeper, more nuanced understanding of preferred topics, the structured environment presented by platforms like Coursera, with its deadlines and assessments, provides a distinct set of benefits related to cognitive load, motivation, and real-world skill development that are worth considering. Ultimately, the effectiveness of a learning path depends on a variety of factors, and the ideal approach will always be tied to individual learning styles, personal circumstances, and long-term career goals.
Create AI-powered tutorials effortlessly: Learn, teach, and share knowledge with our intuitive platform. (Get started for free)
More Posts from aitutorialmaker.com: